Mineola board wants revised 2023-24 calendar
publisher@wood.cm
After debating the merits of the school year ending earlier than usual on May 17, the school board asked the administration to take another look.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Attention subscribers
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Mineola board wants revised 2023-24 calendar
The proposed 2023-24 school calendar for Mineola ISD will get a second look.
After debating the merits of the school year ending earlier than usual on May 17, the school board asked the administration to take another look.
The chief concern was the possibility that, if no bad weather days are needed, school would end on Friday, May 17, a full week before graduation May 24.
And even if the bad weather days do need to be used between May 20-23, trustees and administrators expressed concern that attendance could be low those days.
Superintendent Cody Mize explained that two possible calendars were developed, and the vote was close among the staff – 52% to 48% – on which one to go with.
Unlike this year’s calendar, which had four days built in for bad weather, the proposed calendar has no extra days. Any bad weather would be made up, essentially, after the scheduled end of the school year.
The calendar was favored by some because it allows the first semester to be completed prior to the Christmas holidays.
Mize said the district also looked at reducing the number of teacher in-service days in an effort to create a more professional work environment as a means of competing with neighboring districts who are going to a four-day school week.
Mize said he is not opposed to the 4-day plan, but he wants to see data showing better student outcomes.
“I have not seen that demonstrated anywhere in the state,” he said.
He said teachers, who are focused on the students, have told him that 4-day school weeks are not best for their pupils.
Districts are going to the 4-day week to help retain staff. Mize said it is the culture that retains people.
The two calendars featured start dates of Aug. 16 or Aug. 17 and school resuming after the holidays on Jan. 3 or Jan. 4.
Trustees wrestled with suggestions on how better to use the week of May 20-24 before deciding to table the matter for the March board meeting.